This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Let "gcore" command accept a suffix argument


You are good on it.
Make a new patch is more easy than make me clear with this idea.  :)

Thanks,
Hui

On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 22:00, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
>> But I think we have know the type of the val that we want output, the
>> string we want it as string, the number we want it to be number.
>> Are you sure we need point out the type of val to be output?
>>
>> And this idea is out of my ability. ?Sorry about it.
>
> If you could have a look at how the "printf" command is implemented,
> you might be surprised as to how easy this task might be. ?For someone
> who tackled the really complex project of grafting process record onto
> GDB, I sincerely think that this should nearly be a no-brainer for you:
>
> ?1. Extract out the entire contents of the printf_command implementation
> ? ? into a separate function. Let's call it ui_printf:
>
> ? ? ? void
> ? ? ? ui_printf (char *args, ui_file *stream)
>
> ?2. Adjust the body so that all the printf/puts, etc, basically anything
> ? ? printing on stdout, are replace by equivalent calls that print in
> ? ? the given ui_file *stream;
>
> ?3. Implement the body of printf_command by simply calling this new
> ? ? function with gdb_stdout as the ui_file;
>
> ? ? ? printf_command (char *args, int from_tty)
> ? ? ? {
> ? ? ? ? ui_printf (args, gdb_stout);
> ? ? ? }
>
> ?4. Implement the eval function roughly like so:
>
> ? ? ? ?eval_command (char *args, int from_tty)
> ? ? ? ?{
> ? ? ? ? ?struct ui_file *ui_out = mem_fileopen ();
> ? ? ? ? ?char *expanded;
> ? ? ? ? ?struct cleanup *old_chain;
>
> ? ? ? ? ?ui_printf (args, ui_out); ?// That's the new function extracted
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? // from printf_command, which prints
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? // in a ui_file instead of stdout.
> ? ? ? ? ?expanded = ui_file_xstrdup (ui_out, NULL);
> ? ? ? ? ?old_chain = make_cleanup (xfree, expanded);
> ? ? ? ? ?execute_command (expanded, from_tty);
> ? ? ? ? ?do_cleanups (old_chain);
> ? ? ? ?}
>
> --
> Joel
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]