This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: patch for testing purposes


> i accidentally reversed the source and destination source files,
> here it is again.

Ah, ok! :). 

I am sorry if I am repeating the same things, but you forgot to use
-up when generating the patch...  Have you also had the chance to
read the CONTRIBUTE file? The ChangeLog entry is still missing too.
A little word of introduction to explain what you are trying to do
and why would have been helpful as well.

> < /* Print the status word STATUS.  */
> < 
> < static void
> < print_i387_status_word (unsigned int status, struct ui_file *file)
> ---
> > // print the status word
> > // updated 20091231 (development@codenamezero.org)

We do not use C++-style comments in the GDB code, because GDB is
supposed to be buildable with non-GCC compilers supporting ISO C90.
Also, the the "updated 20091231 (development@codenamezero.org)" is
superfluous and should go.

> <   fprintf_filtered (file, "Status Word:         %s",
> < 		    hex_string_custom (status, 4));
> <   fputs_filtered ("  ", file);
> <   fprintf_filtered (file, " %s", (status & 0x0001) ? "IE" : "  ");

It looks like you changed the indentation of the code. This is not
correct. The indentation used in C for GNU projects is 2 spaces.

The change of indentation causes a lot of changes which are not
really changes, and prevents me from easily spot what the real
changes are - if there are any, I couldn't spot them.

-- 
Joel


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]