This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: RFC: %ebp-based backtrace patch
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, matz at suse dot de
- Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 11:59:16 -0500
- Subject: Re: RFC: %ebp-based backtrace patch
- References: <20090706183316.GA26074@caradoc.them.org> <200907062157.n66LvSVF007634@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20090707130040.GA11040@caradoc.them.org> <200907080901.n6891GVC029930@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20090708125330.GA29881@caradoc.them.org>
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 08:53:30AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 11:01:16AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Before comitting this diff, I ran the testsuite, and noticed a
> > regression. The problem is that if you do a function call through a
> > null-function-pointer or an otherwise corrupt function pointer, and
> > get a SIGSEGV, the backtrace no longer shows the frame that did the
> > function call.
> >
> > Until we come up with a way to fix this issue, I'm not going to commit
> > the diff.
>
> Hmm. if (target_read_memory (pc, buf, 1)) ? That's how a similar
> issue is handled on ARM, in arm_stub_unwind_sniffer.
Hi Mark,
I was looking through Ubuntu's local GDB patches and noticed this one
is still outstanding. Will the above work? I can test and
(hopefully) commit it, if you'd like.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery