This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Wording of "catch syscall <number>" warning

From: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
To: Sérgio Durigan Júnior <sergiodj at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
Cc: tromey at redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 22:09:03 -0700
Subject: Re: [RFC] Wording of "catch syscall <number>" warning
References: <20090925003107.87780843AC@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> <200909251639.32714.sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <e394668d0909251315y7cee291hbc1b4798ab5a5f35@mail.gmail.com> <200909262034.26514.sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

2009/9/26 Sérgio Durigan Júnior <sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>:
> Ok, so here it is. ?This patch updates the testcase so that it doesn't fail
> when GDB is built without expat support. ?Also, it removes the unecessary
> warning from breakpoint.c, and updates that existing warning in xml-syscall.c
> in order to tell the user that GDB won't be able to verify syscall numbers if
> no XML support is present.
>
> What do you think now?

Thanks.
It's fine with me.

References:
- [RFC] Wording of "catch syscall <number>" warning
  - From: Doug Evans
- Re: [RFC] Wording of "catch syscall <number>" warning
  - From: Sérgio Durigan Júnior
- Re: [RFC] Wording of "catch syscall <number>" warning
  - From: Doug Evans
- Re: [RFC] Wording of "catch syscall <number>" warning
  - From: Sérgio Durigan Júnior

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]