This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Patch: implement new dynamic varobj spec

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Cc: nickrob at snap dot net dot nz, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:49:09 +0300
Subject: Re: Patch: implement new dynamic varobj spec
References: <m3r5uejz4y.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <19113.58116.381538.294631@totara.tehura.co.nz> <m363bpgti0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:40:23 -0600
> 
> Nick> Existing documentation uses @var for field names, while new uses @samp.
> 
> Yeah.  @var seems clearly wrong there.
> I will change the new code though.

What part of the patch does this refer to?  I didn't yet read the
patch carefully, but just skimming it I don't see any wrong @var.
Please be more specific.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Patch: implement new dynamic varobj spec
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- Patch: implement new dynamic varobj spec
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Patch: implement new dynamic varobj spec
  - From: Nick Roberts
- Re: Patch: implement new dynamic varobj spec
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]