This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Rewrite data cache to use splay tree


On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Doug Evans<dje@google.com> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I checked in a sligntly modified version of this patch.
> The actual stack caching patch is still todo.
>
> 2009-08-20 ?Jacob Potter ?<jdpotter@google.com>
>
> ? ? ? ?Replace dcache with splay tree.
> ? ? ? ?Remove partially implemented writeback support.
> ? ? ? ?* dcache.c: Include splay-tree.h.
> ? ? ? ?(LINE_SIZE_POWER): Change from 5 to 6.
> ? ? ? ?(DCACHE_SIZE): Change from 64 to 4096.
> ? ? ? ?(ENTRY_INVALID, ENTRY_VALID, ENTRY_DIRTY): Delete.
> ? ? ? ?(state_chars): Delete.
> ? ? ? ?(struct dcache_block): Clean up; remove state and anydirty fields.
> ? ? ? ?(struct dcache_struct): Redefine as a splay tree and linked list.
> ? ? ? ?(last_cache): Make static.
> ? ? ? ?(dcache_invalidate, dcache_hit): Rewrite for new cache structure.
> ? ? ? ?(dcache_read_line, dcache_alloc): Rewrite for new cache structure.
> ? ? ? ?(dcache_write_line): Delete.
> ? ? ? ?(dcache_writeback): Delete.
> ? ? ? ?(dcache_peek_byte): Clean up; remove "invalid" state check.
> ? ? ? ?(dcache_poke_byte): Rewrite for new cache structure; clarify comment.
> ? ? ? ?(dcache_splay_tree_compare): New function.
> ? ? ? ?(dcache_init, dcache_free): Rewrite for new cache structure.
> ? ? ? ?(dcache_xfer_memory): Rewrite for new write-through cache structure.
> ? ? ? ?(dcache_print_line): New function.
> ? ? ? ?(dcache_info): Rewrite for new cache structure.
> ? ? ? ?(_initialize_dcache): Update "info dcache" help text.
> ? ? ? ?* dcache.h (dcache_xfer_memory): Update declaration.
> ? ? ? ?* target.c (memory_xfer_partial): Update calls to dcache_xfer_memory.
>

Blech.  There's one more bit of cleanup that needed to be done.  It
was on my mental list, and then got dropped.  One can't use %lx to
print CORE_ADDRs.  Fixing pronto.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]