Re: final i386.floating.record.patch

[paawan oza <paawan1982 at yahoo dot com>]

Hi Hui,
I am not sure which test case (insn)  caused this. would you please send me the example (.c file) which you have tried to run ?
please also try to let me know at which insn (at which point it fails).
Regards,
Oza.

--- On Tue, 8/4/09, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: final i386.floating.record.patch
> To: "paawan oza" <paawan1982@yahoo.com>
> Cc: "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@vmware.com>, "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> Date: Tuesday, August 4, 2009, 8:49 AM
> Hi Paawan,
> 
> Thanks for your work.
> 
> I do a some test works with the test code that you sent in
> before.
> I get the values of fp reg with command "info
> all-registers".
> 
> It looks like some fp reg's values not right in replay
> mode.
> 
> In record mode they are:
> fctrl? ? ? ? ?
> 0x37f??? 895
> fstat? ? ? ? ?
> 0x0??? 0
> ftag? ? ? ?
> ???0xffff??? 65535
> fiseg? ? ? ? ?
> 0x0??? 0
> fioff? ? ? ? ?
> 0x0??? 0
> ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to
> quit---
> foseg? ? ? ? ?
> 0x0??? 0
> fooff? ? ? ? ?
> 0x0??? 0
> fop? ? ? ? ? ?
> 0x0??? 0
> 
> In replay mode they are:
> fctrl? ? ? ? ?
> 0x37f??? 895
> fstat? ? ? ? ?
> 0x6069??? 24681
> ftag? ? ? ?
> ???0x557f??? 21887
> fiseg? ? ? ? ?
> 0x73??? 115
> fioff? ? ? ? ?
> 0x8048bfd??? 134515709
> ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to
> quit---
> foseg? ? ? ? ?
> 0x7b??? 123
> fooff? ? ? ? ?
> 0x0??? 0
> fop? ? ? ? ? ?
> 0x2e9??? 745
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Hui
> 
> 
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <math.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> 
> /* the test intends to test following insns.
> flds faddp fstps fstpl fldl fxch fabs fdivrp fmulp fsubrp
> fucomp fnstsw fsqrt
> fchs f2xm1 fyl2x fxtract fprem1 fld fdecstp fld1 fldl2t
> fldl2e FLDPI
> FLDLG2 FLDLN2
> FLDZ fincstp ffree fptan fpatan fincstp fsincos frndint
> fscale fsin fcos fcmovb
> fcmovbe fcmove fcmovu fcmovnb fcmovnbe fsave frstor fstsw
> */
> 
> float no1,no2,no3,no4,no5,no6,no7;
> double x = 100.345, y = 25.7789;
> long double ldx = 88888888888888888888.88, ldy =
> 9999999999999999999.99;
> float result,resultd,resultld;
> float *float_memory;
> 
> /* initialization of floats */
> void init_floats()
> {
>  no1 = 10.45;
>  no2 = 20.77;
>  no3 = 156.89874646;
>  no4 = 14.56;
>  no5 = 11.11;
>  no6 = 66.77;
>  no7 = 88.88;
>  float_memory = malloc(sizeof(float) * 4);
>  *float_memory = 256.256;
>  *(float_memory + 1) = 356.356;
>  *(float_memory + 2) = 456.456;
>  *(float_memory + 3) = 556.556;
> }
> 
> /* marks FPU stack as empty */
> void empty_fpu_stack()
> {
>  asm ("ffree %st(1) \n\t"
> ? ? ? "ffree %st(2) \n\t"
> ? ? ? "ffree %st(3) \n\t"
> ? ? ? "ffree %st(4) \n\t"
> ? ? ? "ffree %st(5) \n\t"
> ? ? ? "ffree %st(6) \n\t"
> ? ? ? "ffree %st(7)");
> }
> 
> /* tests floating point arithmatic */
> void test_arith_floats()
> {
>  result = no1 + no2 + no3 + no4 + no5 + no6 + no7;
>  printf("result is %f\n",result);
> 
>  result = fmodf(no2,no1);
>  printf("result is %f\n",result);
> 
>  resultd = fmod(x,y);
>  printf("result is %f\n",resultd);
> 
>  resultld = fmodl(ldy,ldy);
>  printf("result is %f\n",resultld);
> 
>  result = fabsf(no1);
>  printf("result is %f\n",result);
> 
>  result = no3 / no4;
>  printf("result is %f\n",result);
> 
>  result = no1 * no2 * no3 * no4;
>  printf("result is %f\n",result);
> 
>  result = no1 - no2 - no3 - no4;
>  printf("result is %f\n",result);
> 
> 
>  asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
>  asm ("fchs");
> 
>  /* test for f2xm1 */
>  asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
>  asm ("f2xm1");
> 
>  asm ("fyl2x");
> 
>  asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
>  asm ("fxtract");
> 
>  asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
>  asm ("fprem1");
> 
>  /* decrement fpu stack pointer only status register should
> get affected */
>  asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
> 
>  empty_fpu_stack();
> 
>  asm ("fld1");
>  asm ("fldl2t");
>  asm ("fldl2e");
>  asm ("fldpi");
>  asm ("fldlg2");
>  asm ("fldln2");
>  asm ("fldz");
> 
>  empty_fpu_stack();
>  /* finishing emptying the stack */
> 
>  result = sqrt(no3);
>  printf("result is %f\n",result);
> }
> 
> void test_log_exp_floats()
> {
>  result = log10(no3);
>  printf("result is %f\n",result);
> 
>  result = log(no3);
>  printf("result is %f\n",result);
> 
>  result = exp10(no3);
>  printf("result is %f\n",result);
> 
>  result = exp(no3);
>  printf("result is %f\n",result);
> }
> 
> void test_trigo_floats()
> {
>  result = sin(30);
>  printf("result is %f\n",result);
> 
>  result = cos(30);
>  printf("result is %f\n",result);
> 
>  result = tan(30);
>  printf("result is %f\n",result);
> 
>  result = atan(30);
>  printf("result is %f\n",result);
> 
>  asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
>  asm ("fptan");
> 
>  /* changes st1 and popping register stack */
>  asm ("fpatan");
> 
>  asm("fincstp");
>  asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(float_memory));
>  asm ("fsincos");
> 
>  asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
>  asm ("frndint");
> 
>  asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
>  asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*(float_memory+1)));
>  asm ("fscale");
> 
>  empty_fpu_stack();
> 
>  asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
>  asm ("fsin");
>  asm ("fcos");
> 
>  /* currently we assume condition likely and always record
> the registers
>  code could be optimized only if the flag is set then
> record */
>  asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
>  asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*(float_memory+1)));
>  asm ("fcmovb %st(1), %st");
>  asm ("fcmovbe %st(1), %st");
>  asm ("fcmove %st(1), %st");
>  asm ("fcmovu %st(1), %st");
>  asm ("fcmovnb %st(1), %st");
>  asm ("fcmovnbe %st(1), %st");
> 
>  empty_fpu_stack();
>  /* finished emtyping the stack */
> }
> 
> void test_compare_floats()
> {
> ???ldy = 88888888888888888888.88;
> ???if (ldx == ldy)
> ? ???ldy =
> 7777777777777777777777777777.777;
> ???else
> ? ???ldy =
> 666666666666666666666666666.666;
> }
> 
> /* test loading and saving of FPU environment */
> void test_fpu_env()
> {
>  asm ("fsave %0" : "=m"(*float_memory) : );
>  asm ("frstor %0" : : "m"(*float_memory));
>  asm ("fstsw %ax");
> }
> 
> int main()
> {
> ???init_floats();
> ???test_arith_floats();
> ???test_log_exp_floats();
> ???test_trigo_floats();
> ???test_compare_floats();
> ???test_fpu_env();
> }
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 22:56, paawan oza<paawan1982@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > please find the patch attached. I have attached as per
> your suggestion.
> > I am attaching it from opera browser.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Oza.
> >
> > --- On Thu, 7/30/09, Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
> >> Subject: Re: final ? i386.floating.record.patch
> >> To: "paawan oza" <paawan1982@yahoo.com>
> >> Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org"
> <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> >> Date: Thursday, July 30, 2009, 11:31 PM
> >> paawan oza wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > please find my answers below.
> >> >
> >> >? 1) Are you using a Windows machine to send
> your
> >> >? emails?? If so,
> >> >? is it possible that there is a Unix/Linux
> >> machine you could
> >> >? try
> >> >? sending from?? Your attachments look OK
> for
> >> me, but
> >> >? some people
> >> >? seem to have had problems with them.
> >> >
> >> > Oza : I used to send all from windows till
> now.
> >> > but this patch I sent it from Linux...from
> opera.
> >> >???2) And are you using cut-and-paste to
> >> insert the patches
> >> >? into the
> >> >? body of your email?? That would certainly
> >> cause
> >> >? problems, because
> >> >? tabs might be changed into spaces (which
> is
> >> exactly what
> >> >? was
> >> >? causing patch to fail for me today).
> >> >? Oza: yes I am using copy-paste....I dont
> know
> >> any-other way.
> >> > because attachmenet are not welcome, so I am
> not sure
> >> how I could proceed with this.
> >>
> >> It's not that attachments are not welcome.
> >> There are various binary encodings for
> attachments, and
> >> some of those binary encodings are not welcome.?
> I
> >> think
> >> because there's no open-source way of decoding
> them.
> >>
> >> If you look at the list, you'll see that
> attachments are
> >> used a lot.
> >>
> >> Copy-and-paste, though, in general will not work,
> because
> >> it
> >> usually changes tabs into spaces, which ruins a
> patch.
> >>
> >>
> >> > I will send you updated patch.....may be I
> might have
> >> mistaken of old gdb file. sorry for incovenience.
> >>
> >> I think it was just the tabs-to-spaces issue.
> >> Why don't you try sending an attachment from
> Opera?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>