This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GDB ARIndex cleanup

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
Cc: Pierre Muller <muller at ics dot u-strasbg dot fr>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:35:50 -0400
Subject: Re: GDB ARIndex cleanup
References: <000001c9ae14$24fb7cd0$6ef27670$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090326230959.GN9472@adacore.com> <001201c9aeb5$44ece820$cec6b860$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090327160004.GT9472@adacore.com>

On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 09:00:04AM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > As Daniel seems to think that is can be useful (maybe for non GNU
> > compilers?) should we use some configure set macro like INLINE that
> > would be set to nothing for GNU gcc but could be inline for other
> > compilers?
> 
> I personally don't see the benefit.  I propose we leave things as
> they are for now and remove the rule about the use of inline.
> Daniel?

Yes, I agree.  The inline keyword is useful for GCC also.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

References:
- GDB ARIndex cleanup
  - From: Pierre Muller
- Re: GDB ARIndex cleanup
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- RE: GDB ARIndex cleanup
  - From: Pierre Muller
- Re: GDB ARIndex cleanup
  - From: Joel Brobecker

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]