This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: MI solib notification
> From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:08:37 +0300
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
> gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com,
> nickrob@snap.net.nz
>
> On Sunday 01 February 2009 21:29:18 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 08:22:28PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > That'd be okay as well, although I don't really understand why it is
> > > better than my suggestion.
> >
> > It's not a big difference; I find it more natural to have the output
> > all grouped together and looking similar to GDB's expected output.
>
> I'd prefer this approach to, because that's how the rest of MI docs do it.
Do we have such long @item's elsewhere in the MI docs? I made a quick
scan and didn't find any, but perhaps I missed something.
> But -- who to I force a break inside @item ?
You can't, AFAIK. Maybe you could use @itemx for all lines but the
first one, but that would be a kludge.
P.S. Please in the future show the original code/Texinfo that prompted
the response above: that was 2 and a half weeks ago, and I no longer
remembered what was this about, nor had the original message in my
mailbox. I had to go to the archives to know what we were talking
about.
TIA