RE: [RFA] Patch to fix "reverse-next" command error

["Marc Khouzam" <marc dot khouzam at ericsson dot com>]

Hi again,

I just noticed I still have the problem of jumping library functions
when using reverse-step.  Seems ok for reverse-next.

Thanks

Marc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org 
> [mailto:gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Marc Khouzam
> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 5:38 AM
> To: teawater; Michael Snyder; Pedro Alves
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Subject: RE: [RFA] Patch to fix "reverse-next" command error
> 
> Hi,
>  
> just to confirm that this fixes the problem for me.
>  
> Thanks teawater
>  
> Marc
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: teawater [mailto:teawater@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thu 1/22/2009 4:00 AM
> To: Michael Snyder; Pedro Alves
> Cc: Marc Khouzam; gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Subject: [RFA] Patch to fix "reverse-next" command error
> 
> 
> 
> Hi guys,
> 
> This patch is for bug in 
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2009-01/msg00146.html
> 
> This issue is because sometime the inferior is already in function
> start address (i.e. plt), set a breakpoint and continue will make
> "reverse-next" work error.
> 
> This patch make inferior step if it reverse step and stop at the
> function start address.
> It tested OK with process record patch and testsuite gdb.twreverse in
> branch reverse-20081226-branch.
> 
> 2009-01-22  Hui Zhu  <teawater@gmail.com>
> 
>         * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Make inferior step if it
>         stepping over a function call in reverse , and stop at the
>         start address of the function.
> 
> OK for mainline?
> 
> Thanks,
> Hui
> 
> 
>