This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 1/4] 'catch syscall' feature -- Architecture-independent part


On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 06:18:24AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> This level is IMO uninteresting, because many important system
> services on Windows are not in the kernel space.

But those aren't system calls; the terminology I'm accustomed to is
quite specific, a system call is a trap from user to kernel mode.
Should we make the description of 'catch syscall' more clear to
exclude other OS facilities?

Trapping on other kinds of Windows events would be a nice feature,
but I don't think it's this same feature.  We have other kinds of
catchpoints (e.g. for Ada exceptions); I think that's the right place
to add Windows system services, if someone contributes an
implementation to catch them.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]