This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] Reverse Debugging, 4/5
- From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- To: Michael Snyder <msnyder at vmware dot com>
- Cc: "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>, Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>, teawater <teawater at gmail dot com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 23:17:37 -0400
- Subject: Re: [RFA] Reverse Debugging, 4/5
- References: <48E3CD40.3070206@vmware.com> <20081006215637.GE21853@adacore.com> <48EA8E20.9090306@vmware.com>
> There's actually another function that implements the
> reverse-finish command. This function is a helper,
> one that just does part of the job.
I think I got that part, perhaps in my attempt to save my fingers
(they REALLY hurt from too much typing right now :-(), I didn't
express what I wanted to say all that well. I hope you got the
idea.
> >>+ /* (Kludgy way of letting wait_for_inferior know...) */
> >>+ tp->step_range_start = tp->step_range_end = 1;
> >
> >AARGH! More special meaning to these addresses. We really ought to
> >clean these up and put some specific flags in the structure, one day.
> >I don't know why we're trying so hard to resume these fields.
>
> OK, in this instance, I did not add the special meaning.
> I was only following what practice was already there. ;-)
right - I was just complaining, not saying that you were responsible
nor asking you to fix it. No problemo (and thanks for bearing with
my whining ;-).
--
Joel