This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Reverse Debugging, 5/5

From: Michael Snyder <msnyder at vmware dot com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
Cc: "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, "drow at false dot org" <drow at false dot org>, "pedro at codesourcery dot com" <pedro at codesourcery dot com>, "teawater at gmail dot com" <teawater at gmail dot com>
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:52:32 -0700
Subject: Re: [RFA] Reverse Debugging, 5/5
References: <48E3CD66.9020600@vmware.com> <umyhmixqu.fsf@gnu.org>

Eli Zaretskii wrote:

+  add_com ("reverse-next", class_run, reverse_next, _("\
+Step program backward, proceeding through subroutine calls.\n\

                        ^
Won't commands like "apropos" stop at the first comma when they
display the short descriptions of commands?

Hmmm, you know, "next" has the same issue.

(gdb) apropos next
[...]
next -- Step program
nexti -- Step one instruction

... why does it stop after a comma, anyways?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA] Reverse Debugging, 5/5
  - From: Eli Zaretskii

References:
- [RFA] Reverse Debugging, 5/5
  - From: Michael Snyder
- Re: [RFA] Reverse Debugging, 5/5
  - From: Eli Zaretskii

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]