This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA 03/08] multi-process support: remote multi-process extensions


On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 05:51:30PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> 2008-09-12  Pedro Alves  <pedro@codesourcery.com>
> 
> 	Implement multi-process extensions.

This looks basically OK to me.  I've got one question, which is not
bad for a patch this size :-)

What about "target remote" vs "target extended-remote"?  Are you
always expected to use target extended-remote to connect to a
multi-process target, and if so, should we enforce that?  Or are
remote and extended-remote supposed to behave the same if the target
is multi-process?

I ask because of the change in remote_detach_1.  If
rs->multi_process_aware is set, we never unregister from
the target.  But we call target_mourn_inferior which will unpush the
remote target in that case.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]