This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA][patch 1/9] Yet another respin of the patch with initial Python support
- From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman at br dot ibm dot com>
- To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- Cc: tromey at redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 01:41:53 -0300
- Subject: Re: [RFA][patch 1/9] Yet another respin of the patch with initial Python support
- References: <20080615181833.uxmo25mg0kko40kw@imap.linux.ibm.com> <1216107418.14956.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> <m3od4z3w0t.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <m3k5fl3ncy.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <1216245620.12209.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080718195010.GA14356@caradoc.them.org> <1216653969.31797.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <uwsj84wx5.fsf@gnu.org> <20080726134252.GA6077@caradoc.them.org> <uvdys4udx.fsf@gnu.org> <20080726144138.GA9711@caradoc.them.org> <m3ljzoefmg.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <uiqus4k91.fsf@gnu.org> <m3zlo4cypz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <ufxpw4hzn.fsf@gnu.org> <m3r69gcwoe.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <u8wvo4eyj.fsf@gnu.org> <1217429936.4804.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> <u4p67p86r.fsf@gnu.org>
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 20:56 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@br.ibm.com>
> > In the first sense, it makes sense to put the Python-related
> > documentation in the "Canned Sequence of Commands" chapter. In the
> > other, it doesn't because it's something different. And the audience of
> > each of those is different.
>
> Sorry, I'm unconvinced. Both features belong to a broader category of
> means of extending GDB.
In that case, my opinion is that the current "Canned Sequences of
Commands" chapter should be demoted to a section (and its sections would
then be demoted to subsubsections), and both this section and Python's
section should be under a chapter called "Extending GDB".
Rereading this thread, I think this is what Daniel suggested in the
first place.
--
[]'s
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center