This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch/MI] Implementation for break-catch command

From: Aleksandar Ristovski <aristovski at qnx dot com>
To: Vladimir Prus <vladimir at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Nick Roberts <nickrob at snap dot net dot nz>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:22:45 -0400
Subject: Re: [patch/MI] Implementation for break-catch command
References: <g1jt6h$ebt$1@ger.gmane.org> <200805312006.11811.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <18497.57814.496794.333674@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <200806010914.22980.vladimir@codesourcery.com>

Vladimir Prus wrote:

On Sunday 01 June 2008 03:40:06 Nick Roberts wrote:
I think all these "breakpoints" should be changed to use observers.  This
seems to just add to the ugliness.
They definitely should.

Well then, what is the preferred way? I can tweak my patch to take your comments into consideration, but if a switch to observers is going to happen soon, then I guess the break-catch should get this new stuff right away? Implementing observer_notify for all the breakpoints would break the compatibility and require quite a bit of work on the testsuite side.

Either way, Vladimir, it's your call - let me know.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch/MI] Implementation for break-catch command
  - From: Vladimir Prus

References:
- Re: [patch/MI] Implementation for break-catch command
  - From: Vladimir Prus

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]