This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [rfc] Relax "printf" function name check in annota* test cases

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand at de dot ibm dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 20:39:26 -0400
Subject: Re: [rfc] Relax "printf" function name check in annota* test cases
References: <20080514220055.GA27367@caradoc.them.org> <200805142245.m4EMjopF021777@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>

On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 12:45:50AM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> B.t.w. even if we were to handle versioned symbols (I have a patch
> for that), the original annota test cases would still break -- 
> because the function would then be called printf@GLIBC...

Ok, thanks.  This patch sounds like the right thing to me then!

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [rfc] Relax "printf" function name check in annota* test cases
  - From: Ulrich Weigand

References:
- Re: [rfc] Relax "printf" function name check in annota* test cases
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [rfc] Relax "printf" function name check in annota* test cases
  - From: Ulrich Weigand

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]