This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] gdb could leave inferior running as a background process

From: "Paul Pluzhnikov" <ppluzhnikov at google dot com>
To: "Paul Pluzhnikov" <ppluzhnikov at google dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:51:29 -0700
Subject: Re: [RFC] gdb could leave inferior running as a background process
References: <8ac60eac0804220741g6b830620h6f83c627fb00474b@mail.gmail.com> <20080422155548.GA13076@caradoc.them.org> <8ac60eac0804220946r689605e1pd4803c2aea3a9e07@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com> wrote:

>  Would attached patch work better then?

Actually, the second patch doesn't fix the problem by itself:
inferior is resumed, then warning is issued, then we block.

So both the first and second patches are needed.

Thanks,
-- 
Paul Pluzhnikov

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] gdb could leave inferior running as a background process
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

References:
- [RFC] gdb could leave inferior running as a background process
  - From: Paul Pluzhnikov
- Re: [RFC] gdb could leave inferior running as a background process
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [RFC] gdb could leave inferior running as a background process
  - From: Paul Pluzhnikov

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]