Re: [PATCH, gdb6.8] -break-list doesn't list multiple breakpoints

[Nick Roberts <nickrob at snap dot net dot nz>]

Bogdan Slusarczyk writes:
 > Hi everyone, I wrote my own patch for -break-list. I'm not sure that it 
 > meets all requirements mentioned in 
 > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-01/msg00251.html and previous 
 > discussions, but combination -break-list + multiple breakpoints is now 
 > usable for me. I'm not familiar with gdb test suit, so it's NOT tested 
 > at all (except few my own cases).
 > 
 > What does it do? Until now -break-list returned:
 > ...
 > 
 > After my changes it returns additional list named 'locations' instead of 
 > second 'addr' field:

I don't think the second 'addr' field should be there, but I'm not sure that I
really like this 'locations' field.  4.1, 4.2 etc are breakpoints and so I
think they should be identified as such (using the bkptno field).  

Notice that you can set them individually:

-break-insert *0x6f14137f
-break-insert *0x0442137f

I also think that 

info break 4.1

and

-break-info 4.1

should just list that breakpoint.  With your patch it doesn't.

-- 
Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob