This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] Remove comments from user_code in gdb_test_multiple
Andrew STUBBS schrieb:
Markus Deuling wrote:
What do you think about the spu info mailbox patch then ? Move the
comment above gdb_test_multiple ? Or use send_gdb/gdb_expect and have
the comments in the right place?
The (?#) directive allows you to put the comments inside the regular
expression itself.
-re "(?#Older kernels had a bug that caused them to return arbitrary
values when
attempting to read from an empty mailbox via spufs.
)SPU Outbound Mailbox.*0x.*SPU Outbound Interrupt
Mailbox.*0x.*$gdb_prompt $"
Or, alternatively, the (?x) directive might be cleaner. Note that this
changes the meaning of white space.
-re "(?x)
#Older kernels had a bug that caused them to return arbitrary
values when
#attempting to read from an empty mailbox via spufs.
SPU Outbound Mailbox.*0x.*SPU Outbound Interrupt Mailbox.*0x.*
$gdb_prompt[ ]$"
This is untested!
Andrew
This is interesting, thank you! Is this documented somewhere? Maybe it would be a good idea
to add one or two lines above gdb_test_multiple or in the Internal's Manual. What do you think ?
Regards,
Markus
--
Markus Deuling
GNU Toolchain for Linux on Cell BE
deuling@de.ibm.com