This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: (gdb-6.8) Discard breakpoint address if shared library is unloaded
Vladimir,
I could use a little help with your feedback. I think I'm getting it,
but I think you might know more about this part of the code.
> Yes. It was in my original patch but I seem to have lost it somehow in the
> intervening period. I attach the updated patch.
Oh, good.
> 2008-02-05 Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
>
> * breakpoint.c (print_one_breakpoint_location): Revert Enb field
> to old format. Discard breakpoint address if shared library is
> unloaded.
I think we're still not there, unfortunately.
> state -- it will be apparent from the locations. */
> if (header_of_multiple)
> pending = 0;
> ! ui_out_field_fmt (uiout, "enabled", "%c",
> ! bpenables[(int) b->enable_state]);
> }
The following code above "ui_out_field_fmt" can be deleted now:
int pending = (b->loc == NULL || b->loc->shlib_disabled);
/* For header of multiple, there's no point showing pending
state -- it will be apparent from the locations. */
if (header_of_multiple)
pending = 0;
That means that the curly braces can go too. We also need to restore
the spacing after the enable state. We end up with:
annotate_field (3);
if (part_of_multiple)
ui_out_field_string (uiout, "enabled", loc->enabled ? "y" : "n");
else
ui_out_field_fmt (uiout, "enabled", "%c",
bpenables[(int) b->enable_state]);
ui_out_spaces (uiout, 2);
> ui_out_field_string (uiout, "addr", "<PENDING>");
> else if (header_of_multiple)
> ui_out_field_string (uiout, "addr", "<MULTIPLE>");
> + else if (loc->shlib_disabled)
> + ui_out_field_string (uiout, "addr", "<PENDING>");
> else
> ui_out_field_core_addr (uiout, "addr", loc->address);
> }
I understand what Vladimir said, but I think that the following should
work too:
@@ -3552,10 +3552,10 @@ print_one_breakpoint_location (struct br
if (addressprint)
{
annotate_field (4);
- if (b->loc == NULL)
- ui_out_field_string (uiout, "addr", "<PENDING>");
- else if (header_of_multiple)
+ if (header_of_multiple)
ui_out_field_string (uiout, "addr", "<MULTIPLE>");
+ if (b->loc == NULL || loc->shlib_disabled)
+ ui_out_field_string (uiout, "addr", "<PENDING>");
else
ui_out_field_core_addr (uiout, "addr", loc->address);
}
The idea is that you can't have header_of_multiple=1 and b->loc == NULL
at the same time. So it's OK to move the check for header_of_multiple
up. And that avoids the code duplication.
--
Joel