This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Inform about new thread in a single place.

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
Cc: vladimir at codesourcery dot com, mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 22:05:16 +0200
Subject: Re: [RFA] Inform about new thread in a single place.
References: <200712142009.08263.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200712142207.19754.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200712141920.lBEJKVI1027649@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <200712142240.20597.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20071214194721.GA2158@caradoc.them.org>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:47:21 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 10:40:20PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > Here's the revised patch. OK?
> 
> linux-nat.c, linux-thread-db.c, and win32-nat.c all print only under
> control of a verbose flag.  While we're unifying the code we should
> unify the behavior too - should this always be shown, or not?

Please also amend the manual as appropriate (it now says the message
is shown unconditionally).

References:
- [RFA] Inform about new thread in a single place.
  - From: Vladimir Prus
- Re: [RFA] Inform about new thread in a single place.
  - From: Vladimir Prus
- Re: [RFA] Inform about new thread in a single place.
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: [RFA] Inform about new thread in a single place.
  - From: Vladimir Prus
- Re: [RFA] Inform about new thread in a single place.
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]