This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Pending breakpoints in MI
- From: Vladimir Prus <ghost at cs dot msu dot su>
- To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:35:45 +0300
- Subject: Re: Pending breakpoints in MI
- References: <200711081412.14452.ghost@cs.msu.su> <fhssfn$j48$1@ger.gmane.org> <fif1n4$mt3$1@ger.gmane.org> <fj6cer$8vo$1@ger.gmane.org>
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
>
>> Vladimir Prus wrote:
>>
>>> Vladimir Prus wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> At the moment, it's not possible to set pending breakpoint
>>>> via MI. This patch fixed it. Now if one does
>>>>
>>>> -break-insert -f symbol_in_shared_lib
>>>>
>>>> GDB will create a pending breakpoint if symbol_in_shared_lib
>>>> is not yet seen. The -f stands for "future". We can't use -p
>>>> since that grabbed by thread option (which cannot be -t since that's
>>>> grabbed by temporary option). Apple branch uses -f as well,
>>>> as we might as well be compatible (even if the code is completely
>>>> different).
>>>>
>>>> OK?
>>>
>>> PING?
>>
>> PING 2?
>
> PING 3?
PING 4?
- Volodya