This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] XLF Fortran: Remove an inappropriate complaint [Re: XLF Fortran arrays test]

On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 11:10:37PM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > The code below the
> > complaint is creating a signed integer type the size of an address.
> > So your patch is OK.  Thanks.
> 
> I see now my point is wrong.  The code still violates (notwithstanding of any
> of my Fortran patches) the DWARF standard as it ignores
> DW_AT_lower_bound/DW_AT_upper_bound/DW_AT_count with DW_FORM_ref* which may
> specify the intended type through another DIE (as can be seen in DWARF3 D.2.2).

I'm confused.  What's wrong?

The patch I was replying to removed the complaint call.  That seems
fine, since it isn't related to DW_FORM_ref* support.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]