Re: [rfc] [03/05] Get rid of current_gdbarch in register_sim_regno

[Markus Deuling <deuling at de dot ibm dot com>]

Ulrich Weigand schrieb:
> Markus Deuling wrote:

> Those changes are OK, but you should at the same time
> add the gdbarch parameter to the one2one_register_sim_regno
> routine, since this is intended as a routine that can be
> used as argument to gdbarch_set_register_sim_regno.
>
> In fact, it would be good if you could also change the
> *callers* of gdbarch_register_sim_regno to make sure
> they really all have a gdbarch available.

Hi Uli,

sorry for the delay.  Please see my patch: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2007-11/msg00263.html

The update of that callers is part of that trivial replacement patch. I hope this is ok?


--
Markus Deuling
GNU Toolchain for Linux on Cell BE
deuling@de.ibm.com