This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: [RFC] Doschk.c and update-web-ari changes



> -----Original Message-----
> From: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches-
> owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Eli Zaretskii
> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 11:45 AM
> To: Pierre Muller
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org; drow@false.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC] Doschk.c and update-web-ari changes
> 
> > From: "Pierre Muller" <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
> > Cc: "'Eli Zaretskii'" <eliz@gnu.org>,
> > 	<drow@false.org>
> > Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 09:44:06 +0200
> >
> >   Here are the changes I made to doschk.c
> > and update-web-ari to get a better result.
> >
> >   The changes inside doschk.c are mainly aimed
> > to facilitate the correct handling by update-web-ari.
> 
> FWIW, I don't think it's a good idea to change doschk.c for this.
> This program is widely available and used, so it's better to modify
> our script to use doschk's output as-is; otherwise everyone will need
> to install a patched doschk to get things right, and also we will need
> to remember to keep a patched version where the ari script is run.

  I thought that this was a local file only,
is it part of the djgpp distribution?
  I found a directory named doschk
in src/utils but the directory is empty...


  Do you know if the file in the ss directory is the
same as your file? 
  Where is the main source located?

 
> >   As you will see, lots of these duplicates are
> > in directories that will probably not be in the DJGPP
> > gdb sources.
> 
> If you want to rely on the fact that some directories are omitted from
> the DJGPP source zip files, then I don't think it's right to do so,
> because the file-name conflicts are already resolved in those zip
> files anyhow.  What is important is that a DJGPP user could unpack the
> official GDB tarball using djunpack.bat without any problems.  This
> means that file-name conflicts in the official GDB tarball should be
> resolved either by renaming files or by adding lines to fnchange.lst.

  It should also be possible to do that.
I will just need to get the directory from the 
fullname part.
  Currently, with the cvs doschk.c sources,
I get this:
CHANGELO DOS 8.3 dup	4	Filename gdb/ChangeLog
					Filename gdb/ChangeLog-2006
					Filename opcodes/ChangeLog
					Filename opcodes/ChangeLog-2006
 
Which are of course two separate duplicates.

> > 	* doschk.c (fill_ent): Use lowercase characters.
> 
> Why?
> 
> > 	(display_problems): Also proint relative path with dos_name.
>                                  ^^^^^^
> You meant "print".

  Yes of course, sorry.

Pierre



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]