This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] win32-nat.c: Handle EXCEPTION_INVALID_HANDLE as SIGSYS

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: "Pierre Muller" <muller at ics dot u-strasbg dot fr>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:06:42 +0200
Subject: Re: [RFC] win32-nat.c: Handle EXCEPTION_INVALID_HANDLE as SIGSYS
References: <008101c814b1$9aeb2dd0$d0c18970$@u-strasbg.fr> <20071023214730.GB5570@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <ubqaprw81.fsf@gnu.org> <001a01c81615$c58a7950$509f6bf0$@u-strasbg.fr>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> From: "Pierre Muller" <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:13:34 +0200
> 
> > > And, amusingly enough, this patch illustrates, within days of making
> > > mingw available, exactly the kind of situation I didn't want to get into
> > > by allowing gdb to build under MinGW.  It forces me to evaluate a
> > > multipage patch which isn't needed for Cygwin.
> > 
> > Which is exactly the reason I suggested to make MinGW a separate
> > target with a separate *-nat.c file.
> 
> Why?

Because Chris is annoyed, and I wanted to avoid that.

References:
- [RFC] win32-nat.c: Handle EXCEPTION_INVALID_HANDLE as SIGSYS
  - From: Pierre Muller
- Re: [RFC] win32-nat.c: Handle EXCEPTION_INVALID_HANDLE as SIGSYS
  - From: Christopher Faylor
- Re: [RFC] win32-nat.c: Handle EXCEPTION_INVALID_HANDLE as SIGSYS
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- RE: [RFC] win32-nat.c: Handle EXCEPTION_INVALID_HANDLE as SIGSYS
  - From: Pierre Muller

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]