This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] Backtrace prints wrong argument value
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- Cc: Luis Machado <luisgpm at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:05:50 -0400
- Subject: Re: [patch] Backtrace prints wrong argument value
- References: <1190034278.4651.10.camel@localhost> <20070917131542.GA12835@caradoc.them.org> <1190035779.4651.16.camel@localhost> <20070917133700.GA14300@caradoc.them.org> <1190037624.4651.24.camel@localhost> <20070917140416.GA15635@caradoc.them.org> <1190049306.4651.42.camel@localhost> <20070917171821.GA2107@caradoc.them.org> <1192997096.5584.2.camel@localhost> <20071021232837.GD6180@adacore.com>
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 04:28:37PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > > > 2007-09-17 Luis Machado <luisgpm@br.ibm.com>
> > > >
> > > > * rs6000-tdep.c (ppc_dwarf2_frame_init_reg): New function.
> > > > (rs6000_gdbarch_init): Install ppc_dwarf2_frame_init_reg as
> > > > default dwarf2_frame_set_init_reg function.
> > >
> > > OK.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks. I've commited this now.
>
> Luis asked me whether he could commit to the branch. I looked at the
> patch, and it seems pretty safe to me. Does anyone have reservations
> about this going to the branch? Daniel?
Sounds fine to me.
There are now a pile (three, I believe) of PRs about Solaris build
failures. Is there someone familiar with Solaris who could take a
look at them? I think we have one at work that I could borrow for
this, but it'll take me a while.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery