This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On Saturday 08 September 2007 15:50:24 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com> > > Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 03:13:33 +0400 > > > > + One case I'm not sure about is where originally we've > > + set breakpoint at file:line. There were several PC values > > + for that file:line, due to optimization, all in one block. > > + We've picked on PC value. If "clear" is issued with another > > + PC corresponding to the same file:line, what should we do? */ > > I think we should ask the user what she meant. I have pondered about this, and I no longer thing we have much choice, or that we really need to ask the user. The situation comment talks about is this: - User sets breakpoints at some line - Due to optimization, there are two PC corresponding to that line -- PC1 and PC2 - With my patches, the first PC is selected. - User says 'clear PC2'. What user just did does not seem a common use case. Typically, user will just use 'clear' (without parameter) after hitting a breakpoint. And we set breakpoint on PC1, so no problem. Another possible, though less likely case, is when user looks at breakpoint table, notes PC, and says "clear PC". But the breakpoint table will only list PC1. So, the only possibility for user to issue 'clear PC2' is when user guessed that PC2 is also PC corresponding to original line. This does not seem very important case to support. I've clarified the comment to reflect this. I have also fixed license/copyright years on the new test files. The revised patch is attached, OK? - Volodya
Attachment:
mainline_9_expansion.ChangeLog
Description: Text document
--- gdb/breakpoint.c (/work/mb_mainline/8_multiple_locations) (revision 4832)
+++ gdb/breakpoint.c (/work/mb_mainline/9_expansion) (revision 4832)
@@ -5184,6 +5184,128 @@ create_breakpoint (struct symtabs_and_li
mention (b);
}
+/* Remove element at INDEX_TO_REMOVE from SAL, shifting other
+ elements to fill the void space. */
+static void remove_sal (struct symtabs_and_lines *sal, int index_to_remove)
+{
+ int i = index_to_remove+1;
+ int last_index = sal->nelts-1;
+
+ for (;i <= last_index; ++i)
+ sal->sals[i-1] = sal->sals[i];
+
+ --(sal->nelts);
+}
+
+/* If appropriate, obtains all sals that correspond
+ to the same file and line as SAL. This is done
+ only if SAL does not have explicit PC and has
+ line and file information. If we got just a single
+ expanded sal, return the original.
+
+ Otherwise, if SAL.explicit_line is not set, filter out
+ all sals for which the name of enclosing function
+ is different from SAL. This makes sure that if we have
+ breakpoint originally set in template instantiation, say
+ foo<int>(), we won't expand SAL to locations at the same
+ line in all existing instantiations of 'foo'.
+
+*/
+struct symtabs_and_lines
+expand_line_sal_maybe (struct symtab_and_line sal)
+{
+ struct symtabs_and_lines expanded;
+ CORE_ADDR original_pc = sal.pc;
+ char *original_function = NULL;
+ int found;
+ int i;
+
+ /* If we have explicit pc, don't expand.
+ If we have no line number, we can't expand. */
+ if (sal.explicit_pc || sal.line == 0 || sal.symtab == NULL)
+ {
+ expanded.nelts = 1;
+ expanded.sals = xmalloc (sizeof (struct symtab_and_line));
+ expanded.sals[0] = sal;
+ return expanded;
+ }
+
+ sal.pc = 0;
+ find_pc_partial_function (original_pc, &original_function, NULL, NULL);
+
+ expanded = expand_line_sal (sal);
+ if (expanded.nelts == 1)
+ {
+ /* We had one sal, we got one sal. Without futher
+ processing, just return the original sal. */
+ xfree (expanded.sals);
+ expanded.nelts = 1;
+ expanded.sals = xmalloc (sizeof (struct symtab_and_line));
+ sal.pc = original_pc;
+ expanded.sals[0] = sal;
+ return expanded;
+ }
+
+ if (!sal.explicit_line)
+ {
+ CORE_ADDR func_addr, func_end;
+ for (i = 0; i < expanded.nelts; ++i)
+ {
+ CORE_ADDR pc = expanded.sals[i].pc;
+ char *this_function;
+ if (find_pc_partial_function (pc, &this_function,
+ &func_addr, &func_end))
+ {
+ if (this_function &&
+ strcmp (this_function, original_function) != 0)
+ {
+ remove_sal (&expanded, i);
+ --i;
+ }
+ else if (func_addr == pc)
+ {
+ /* We're at beginning of a function, and should
+ skip prologue. */
+ struct symbol *sym = find_pc_function (pc);
+ if (sym)
+ expanded.sals[i] = find_function_start_sal (sym, 1);
+ else
+ expanded.sals[i].pc
+ = gdbarch_skip_prologue (current_gdbarch, pc);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+
+ if (expanded.nelts <= 1)
+ {
+ /* This is un ugly workaround. If we get zero
+ expanded sals then something is really wrong.
+ Fix that by returnign the original sal. */
+ xfree (expanded.sals);
+ expanded.nelts = 1;
+ expanded.sals = xmalloc (sizeof (struct symtab_and_line));
+ sal.pc = original_pc;
+ expanded.sals[0] = sal;
+ return expanded;
+ }
+
+ if (original_pc)
+ {
+ found = 0;
+ for (i = 0; i < expanded.nelts; ++i)
+ if (expanded.sals[i].pc == original_pc)
+ {
+ found = 1;
+ break;
+ }
+ gdb_assert (found);
+ }
+
+ return expanded;
+}
+
/* Add SALS.nelts breakpoints to the breakpoint table. For each
SALS.sal[i] breakpoint, include the corresponding ADDR_STRING[i]
value. COND_STRING, if not NULL, specified the condition to be
@@ -5214,11 +5336,10 @@ create_breakpoints (struct symtabs_and_l
int i;
for (i = 0; i < sals.nelts; ++i)
{
- struct symtabs_and_lines sals2;
- sals2.sals = sals.sals + i;
- sals2.nelts = 1;
+ struct symtabs_and_lines expanded =
+ expand_line_sal_maybe (sals.sals[i]);
- create_breakpoint (sals2, addr_string[i],
+ create_breakpoint (expanded, addr_string[i],
cond_string, type, disposition,
thread, ignore_count, from_tty,
pending_bp);
@@ -6889,6 +7010,23 @@ clear_command (char *arg, int from_tty)
default_match = 1;
}
+ /* We don't call resolve_sal_pc here. That's not
+ as bad as it seems, because all existing breakpoints
+ typically have both file/line and pc set. So, if
+ clear is given file/line, we can match this to existing
+ breakpoint without obtaining pc at all.
+
+ We only support clearing given the address explicitly
+ present in breakpoint table. Say, we've set breakpoint
+ at file:line. There were several PC values for that file:line,
+ due to optimization, all in one block.
+ We've picked on PC value. If "clear" is issued with another
+ PC corresponding to the same file:line, the breakpoint won't
+ be cleared. We probably can still clear the breakpoint, but
+ since the other PC value is never presented to user, user
+ can only find it by guessing, and it does not seem important
+ to support that. */
+
/* For each line spec given, delete bps which correspond
to it. Do it in two passes, solely to preserve the current
behavior that from_tty is forced true if we delete more than
@@ -7404,8 +7542,12 @@ update_breakpoint_locations (struct brea
}
}
- if (existing_locations)
- free_bp_location (existing_locations);
+ while (existing_locations)
+ {
+ struct bp_location *next = existing_locations->next;
+ free_bp_location (existing_locations);
+ existing_locations = next;
+ }
}
@@ -7423,6 +7565,7 @@ breakpoint_re_set_one (void *bint)
int not_found = 0;
int *not_found_ptr = ¬_found;
struct symtabs_and_lines sals = {};
+ struct symtabs_and_lines expanded;
char *s;
enum enable_state save_enable;
struct gdb_exception e;
@@ -7497,8 +7640,8 @@ breakpoint_re_set_one (void *bint)
b->thread = thread;
b->condition_not_parsed = 0;
}
-
- update_breakpoint_locations (b, sals);
+ expanded = expand_line_sal_maybe (sals.sals[0]);
+ update_breakpoint_locations (b, expanded);
/* Now that this is re-enabled, check_duplicates
can be used. */
--- gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/mb-ctor.cc (/work/mb_mainline/8_multiple_locations) (revision 4832)
+++ gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/mb-ctor.cc (/work/mb_mainline/9_expansion) (revision 4832)
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+
+#include <stdio.h>
+
+class Base
+{
+public:
+ Base(int k);
+ ~Base();
+ virtual void foo() {}
+private:
+ int k;
+};
+
+Base::Base(int k)
+{
+ this->k = k;
+}
+
+Base::~Base()
+{
+ printf("~Base\n");
+}
+
+class Derived : public virtual Base
+{
+public:
+ Derived(int i);
+ ~Derived();
+private:
+ int i;
+};
+
+Derived::Derived(int i) : Base(i)
+{
+ this->i = i;
+}
+
+Derived::~Derived()
+{
+ printf("~Derived\n");
+}
+
+class DeeplyDerived : public Derived
+{
+public:
+ DeeplyDerived(int i) : Base(i), Derived(i) {}
+};
+
+int main()
+{
+ /* Invokes the Derived ctor that constructs both
+ Derived and Base. */
+ Derived d(7);
+ /* Invokes the Derived ctor that constructs only
+ Derived. Base is constructed separately by
+ DeeplyDerived's ctor. */
+ DeeplyDerived dd(15);
+}
--- gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/mb-ctor.exp (/work/mb_mainline/8_multiple_locations) (revision 4832)
+++ gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/mb-ctor.exp (/work/mb_mainline/9_expansion) (revision 4832)
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+# Copyright 2007
+# Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+# (at your option) any later version.
+#
+# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+# GNU General Public License for more details.
+#
+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+
+# Test that breakpoints on C++ constructors work, despite the
+# fact that gcc generates several versions of constructor function.
+
+if $tracelevel then {
+ strace $tracelevel
+}
+
+set prms_id 0
+set bug_id 0
+
+set testfile "mb-ctor"
+set srcfile ${testfile}.cc
+set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
+
+if [get_compiler_info ${binfile} "c++"] {
+ return -1
+}
+
+if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable {debug c++}] != "" } {
+ untested mb-ctor.exp
+ return -1
+}
+
+gdb_exit
+gdb_start
+gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
+gdb_load ${binfile}
+
+# Set a breakpoint with multiple locations
+# and a condition.
+
+gdb_test "break 'Derived::Derived(int)'" \
+ "Breakpoint.*at.* file .*$srcfile, line.*\\(2 locations\\).*" \
+ "set-breakpoint at ctor"
+
+gdb_test "break 'Derived::~Derived()'" \
+ "Breakpoint.*at.* file .*$srcfile, line.*\\(2 locations\\).*" \
+ "set-breakpoint at ctor"
+
+gdb_run_cmd
+gdb_expect {
+ -re "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+,.*Derived.*i=7.*$gdb_prompt $" {
+ pass "run to breakpoint"
+ }
+ -re "$gdb_prompt $" {
+ fail "run to breakpoint"
+ }
+ timeout {
+ fail "run to breakpoint (timeout)"
+ }
+}
+
+gdb_test "continue" \
+ ".*Breakpoint.*Derived.*i=15.*" \
+ "run to breakpoint 2"
+
+gdb_test "continue" \
+ ".*Breakpoint.*~Derived.*" \
+ "run to breakpoint 3"
+
+gdb_test "continue" \
+ ".*Breakpoint.*~Derived.*" \
+ "run to breakpoint 4"
+
+gdb_test "continue" \
+ ".*exited normally.*" \
+ "run to exit"
+
+
+
--- gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/mb-templates.cc (/work/mb_mainline/8_multiple_locations) (revision 4832)
+++ gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/mb-templates.cc (/work/mb_mainline/9_expansion) (revision 4832)
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+
+#include <iostream>
+using namespace std;
+
+template<class T>
+void foo(T i)
+{
+ std::cout << "hi\n"; // set breakpoint here
+}
+
+int main()
+{
+ foo<int>(0);
+ foo<double>(0);
+ foo<int>(1);
+ foo<double>(1);
+ foo<int>(2);
+ foo<double>(2);
+}
--- gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/mb-templates.exp (/work/mb_mainline/8_multiple_locations) (revision 4832)
+++ gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/mb-templates.exp (/work/mb_mainline/9_expansion) (revision 4832)
@@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
+# Copyright 2007
+# Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+# (at your option) any later version.
+#
+# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+# GNU General Public License for more details.
+#
+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+
+# This test verifies that setting breakpoint on line in template
+# function will fire in all instantiations of that template.
+
+if $tracelevel then {
+ strace $tracelevel
+}
+
+set prms_id 0
+set bug_id 0
+
+set testfile "mb-templates"
+set srcfile ${testfile}.cc
+set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
+
+if [get_compiler_info ${binfile} "c++"] {
+ return -1
+}
+
+if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable {debug c++}] != "" } {
+ untested mb-templates.exp
+ return -1
+}
+
+gdb_exit
+gdb_start
+gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
+gdb_load ${binfile}
+
+set bp_location [gdb_get_line_number "set breakpoint here"]
+
+# Set a breakpoint with multiple locations
+# and a condition.
+
+gdb_test "break $srcfile:$bp_location if i==1" \
+ "Breakpoint.*at.* file .*$srcfile, line.*\\(2 locations\\).*" \
+ "initial condition: set breakpoint"
+
+gdb_run_cmd
+gdb_expect {
+ -re "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+,.*foo<int> \\(i=1\\).*$gdb_prompt $" {
+ pass "initial condition: run to breakpoint"
+ }
+ -re "$gdb_prompt $" {
+ fail "initial condition: run to breakpoint"
+ }
+ timeout {
+ fail "initial condition: run to breakpoint (timeout)"
+ }
+}
+
+gdb_test "continue" \
+ ".*Breakpoint.*foo<double> \\(i=1\\).*" \
+ "initial condition: run to breakpoint 2"
+
+# Set breakpoint with multiple locations.
+# Separately set the condition.
+gdb_exit
+gdb_start
+gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
+gdb_load ${binfile}
+
+gdb_test "break $srcfile:$bp_location" \
+ "Breakpoint.*at.* file .*$srcfile, line.*\\(2 locations\\).*" \
+ "separate condition: set breakpoint"
+
+gdb_test "condition 1 i==1" "" \
+ "separate condition: set condition"
+
+gdb_run_cmd
+gdb_expect {
+ -re "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+,.*foo<int> \\(i=1\\).*$gdb_prompt $" {
+ pass "separate condition: run to breakpoint"
+ }
+ -re "$gdb_prompt $" {
+ fail "separate condition: run to breakpoint"
+ }
+ timeout {
+ fail "separate condition: run to breakpoint (timeout)"
+ }
+}
+
+gdb_test "continue" \
+ ".*Breakpoint.*foo<double> \\(i=1\\).*" \
+ "separate condition: run to breakpoint 2"
+
+# Try disabling a single location. We also test
+# that at least in simple cases, the enable/disable
+# state of locations surive "run".
+gdb_test "disable 1.1" "" "disabling location: disable"
+
+gdb_run_cmd
+gdb_expect {
+ -re "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+,.*foo<double> \\(i=1\\).*$gdb_prompt $" {
+ pass "disabling location: run to breakpoint"
+ }
+ -re "$gdb_prompt $" {
+ fail "disabling location: run to breakpoint"
+ }
+ timeout {
+ fail "disabling location: run to breakpoint (timeout)"
+ }
+}
+
+# Try disabling entire breakpoint
+gdb_test "enable 1.1" "" "disabling location: enable"
+
+
+gdb_test "disable 1" "" "disable breakpoint: disable"
+
+gdb_run_cmd
+gdb_expect {
+ -re "Program exited normally.*$gdb_prompt $" {
+ pass "disable breakpoint: run to breakpoint"
+ }
+ -re "$gdb_prompt $" {
+ fail "disable breakpoint: run to breakpoint"
+ }
+ timeout {
+ fail "disable breakpoint: run to breakpoint (timeout)"
+ }
+}
+
+# Make sure breakpoint can be set on a specific instantion.
+delete_breakpoints
+gdb_test "break 'void foo<int>(int)'" ".*" \
+ "instantiation: set breakpoint"
+
+
+gdb_run_cmd
+gdb_expect {
+ -re ".*Breakpoint \[0-9\]+,.*foo<int> \\(i=0\\).*$gdb_prompt $" {
+ pass "instantiation: run to breakpoint"
+ }
+ -re "$gdb_prompt $" {
+ fail "instantiation: run to breakpoint"
+ }
+ timeout {
+ fail "instantiation: run to breakpoint (timeout)"
+ }
+}
+
+gdb_test "continue" \
+ ".*Breakpoint.*foo<int> \\(i=1\\).*" \
+ "instantiation: run to breakpoint 2"
+
--- gdb/linespec.c (/work/mb_mainline/8_multiple_locations) (revision 4832)
+++ gdb/linespec.c (/work/mb_mainline/9_expansion) (revision 4832)
@@ -963,6 +963,7 @@ decode_indirect (char **argptr)
values.sals[0] = find_pc_line (pc, 0);
values.sals[0].pc = pc;
values.sals[0].section = find_pc_overlay (pc);
+ values.sals[0].explicit_pc = 1;
return values;
}
@@ -1633,6 +1634,7 @@ decode_all_digits (char **argptr, struct
values.nelts = 1;
if (need_canonical)
build_canonical_line_spec (values.sals, NULL, canonical);
+ values.sals[0].explicit_line = 1;
return values;
}
--- gdb/symtab.c (/work/mb_mainline/8_multiple_locations) (revision 4832)
+++ gdb/symtab.c (/work/mb_mainline/9_expansion) (revision 4832)
@@ -691,6 +691,8 @@ init_sal (struct symtab_and_line *sal)
sal->line = 0;
sal->pc = 0;
sal->end = 0;
+ sal->explicit_pc = 0;
+ sal->explicit_line = 0;
}
@@ -4172,6 +4174,166 @@ symtab_observer_executable_changed (void
set_main_name (NULL);
}
+/* Helper to expand_line_sal below. Appends new sal to SAL,
+ initializing it from SYMTAB, LINENO and PC. */
+static void
+append_expanded_sal (struct symtabs_and_lines *sal,
+ struct symtab *symtab,
+ int lineno, CORE_ADDR pc)
+{
+ CORE_ADDR func_addr, func_end;
+
+ sal->sals = xrealloc (sal->sals,
+ sizeof (sal->sals[0])
+ * (sal->nelts + 1));
+ init_sal (sal->sals + sal->nelts);
+ sal->sals[sal->nelts].symtab = symtab;
+ sal->sals[sal->nelts].section = NULL;
+ sal->sals[sal->nelts].end = 0;
+ sal->sals[sal->nelts].line = lineno;
+ sal->sals[sal->nelts].pc = pc;
+ ++sal->nelts;
+}
+
+/* Compute a set of all sals in
+ the entire program that correspond to same file
+ and line as SAL and return those. If there
+ are several sals that belong to the same block,
+ only one sal for the block is included in results. */
+
+struct symtabs_and_lines
+expand_line_sal (struct symtab_and_line sal)
+{
+ struct symtabs_and_lines ret, this_line;
+ int i, j;
+ struct objfile *objfile;
+ struct partial_symtab *psymtab;
+ struct symtab *symtab;
+ int lineno;
+ int deleted = 0;
+ struct block **blocks = NULL;
+ int *filter;
+
+ ret.nelts = 0;
+ ret.sals = NULL;
+
+ if (sal.symtab == NULL || sal.line == 0 || sal.pc != 0)
+ {
+ ret.sals = xmalloc (sizeof (struct symtab_and_line));
+ ret.sals[0] = sal;
+ ret.nelts = 1;
+ return ret;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ struct linetable_entry *best_item = 0;
+ struct symtab *best_symtab = 0;
+ int exact = 0;
+
+ lineno = sal.line;
+
+ /* We meed to find all symtabs for a file which name
+ is described by sal. We cannot just directly
+ iterate over symtabs, since a symtab might not be
+ yet created. We also cannot iterate over psymtabs,
+ calling PSYMTAB_TO_SYMTAB and working on that symtab,
+ since PSYMTAB_TO_SYMTAB will return NULL for psymtab
+ corresponding to an included file. Therefore, we do
+ first pass over psymtabs, reading in those with
+ the right name. Then, we iterate over symtabs, knowing
+ that all symtabs we're interested in are loaded. */
+
+ ALL_PSYMTABS (objfile, psymtab)
+ {
+ if (strcmp (sal.symtab->filename,
+ psymtab->filename) == 0)
+ PSYMTAB_TO_SYMTAB (psymtab);
+ }
+
+
+ /* For each symtab, we add all pcs to ret.sals. I'm actually
+ not sure what to do if we have exact match in one symtab,
+ and non-exact match on another symtab.
+ */
+ ALL_SYMTABS (objfile, symtab)
+ {
+ if (strcmp (sal.symtab->filename,
+ symtab->filename) == 0)
+ {
+ struct linetable *l;
+ int len;
+ l = LINETABLE (symtab);
+ if (!l)
+ continue;
+ len = l->nitems;
+
+ for (j = 0; j < len; j++)
+ {
+ struct linetable_entry *item = &(l->item[j]);
+
+ if (item->line == lineno)
+ {
+ exact = 1;
+ append_expanded_sal (&ret, symtab, lineno, item->pc);
+ }
+ else if (!exact && item->line > lineno
+ && (best_item == NULL || item->line < best_item->line))
+
+ {
+ best_item = item;
+ best_symtab = symtab;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ if (!exact && best_item)
+ append_expanded_sal (&ret, best_symtab, lineno, best_item->pc);
+ }
+
+ /* For optimized code, compiler can scatter one source line accross
+ disjoint ranges of PC values, even when no duplicate functions
+ or inline functions are involved. For example, 'for (;;)' inside
+ non-template non-inline non-ctor-or-dtor function can result
+ in two PC ranges. In this case, we don't want to set breakpoint
+ on first PC of each range. To filter such cases, we use containing
+ blocks -- for each PC found above we see if there are other PCs
+ that are in the same block. If yes, the other PCs are filtered out. */
+
+ filter = xmalloc (ret.nelts * sizeof (int));
+ blocks = xmalloc (ret.nelts * sizeof (struct block *));
+ for (i = 0; i < ret.nelts; ++i)
+ {
+ filter[i] = 1;
+ blocks[i] = block_for_pc (ret.sals[i].pc);
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ret.nelts; ++i)
+ if (blocks[i] != NULL)
+ for (j = i+1; j < ret.nelts; ++j)
+ if (blocks[j] == blocks[i])
+ {
+ filter[j] = 0;
+ ++deleted;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ {
+ struct symtab_and_line *final =
+ xmalloc (sizeof (struct symtab_and_line) * (ret.nelts-deleted));
+
+ for (i = 0, j = 0; i < ret.nelts; ++i)
+ if (filter[i])
+ final[j++] = ret.sals[i];
+
+ ret.nelts -= deleted;
+ xfree (ret.sals);
+ ret.sals = final;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+
void
_initialize_symtab (void)
{
--- gdb/symtab.h (/work/mb_mainline/8_multiple_locations) (revision 4832)
+++ gdb/symtab.h (/work/mb_mainline/9_expansion) (revision 4832)
@@ -1213,6 +1213,8 @@ struct symtab_and_line
CORE_ADDR pc;
CORE_ADDR end;
+ int explicit_pc;
+ int explicit_line;
};
extern void init_sal (struct symtab_and_line *sal);
@@ -1404,5 +1406,7 @@ struct symbol *lookup_global_symbol_from
const domain_enum domain,
struct symtab **symtab);
+extern struct symtabs_and_lines
+expand_line_sal (struct symtab_and_line sal);
#endif /* !defined(SYMTAB_H) */
Property changes on: gdb
___________________________________________________________________
Name: svk:merge
+d48a11ec-ee1c-0410-b3f5-c20844f99675:/work/mb_mainline/8_multiple_locations/gdb:4831
Property changes on:
___________________________________________________________________
Name: svk:merge
d48a11ec-ee1c-0410-b3f5-c20844f99675:/work/mb_mainline/5_per_loc_cond:4824
d48a11ec-ee1c-0410-b3f5-c20844f99675:/work/mb_mainline/6_create_breakpoints_refactoring:4825
d48a11ec-ee1c-0410-b3f5-c20844f99675:/work/mb_mainline/7_pending:4829
+d48a11ec-ee1c-0410-b3f5-c20844f99675:/work/mb_mainline/8_multiple_locations:4831
e7755896-6108-0410-9592-8049d3e74e28:/mirrors/gdb/trunk:182811
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |