This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] printf "%p" gdb internal error fix


On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 09:31:15PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 19:20:37 +0200
> > From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > (gdb) printf "%p\n", (void *) 7
> > internal error in printf_command

> Hmm, this will not do the right thing when you try to print a 64-bit
> pointer on a 32-bit host.

Better late than never...

Here is a patch for %p which does not rely on the size of a host
pointer.  Instead of using the underlying system's printf, it chooses
the same implementation-defined behavior chosen by glibc (%#x for
non-zero pointers and "(nil)" for null pointers).

I tested this on x86_64-linux and checked it in.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

2007-09-04  Daniel Jacobowitz  <dan@codesourcery.com>

	* printcmd.c (printf_command): Handle ptr_arg.  Correct typo
	in internal error message.

2007-09-04  Daniel Jacobowitz  <dan@codesourcery.com>

	* gdb.base/display.exp: Add tests for printf %p.

Index: printcmd.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/printcmd.c,v
retrieving revision 1.109
diff -u -p -r1.109 printcmd.c
--- printcmd.c	23 Aug 2007 18:08:36 -0000	1.109
+++ printcmd.c	4 Sep 2007 13:59:44 -0000
@@ -2079,9 +2079,68 @@ printf_command (char *arg, int from_tty)
 	      printf_filtered (current_substring, val);
 	      break;
 	    }
+	  case ptr_arg:
+	    {
+	      /* We avoid the host's %p because pointers are too
+		 likely to be the wrong size.  The only interesting
+		 modifier for %p is a width; extract that, and then
+		 handle %p as glibc would: %#x or a literal "(nil)".  */
+
+	      char *p, *fmt, *fmt_p;
+#if defined (CC_HAS_LONG_LONG) && defined (PRINTF_HAS_LONG_LONG)
+	      long long val = value_as_long (val_args[i]);
+#else
+	      long val = value_as_long (val_args[i]);
+#endif
+
+	      fmt = alloca (strlen (current_substring) + 5);
+
+	      /* Copy up to the leading %.  */
+	      p = current_substring;
+	      fmt_p = fmt;
+	      while (*p)
+		{
+		  int is_percent = (*p == '%');
+		  *fmt_p++ = *p++;
+		  if (is_percent)
+		    {
+		      if (*p == '%')
+			*fmt_p++ = *p++;
+		      else
+			break;
+		    }
+		}
+
+	      if (val != 0)
+		*fmt_p++ = '#';
+
+	      /* Copy any width.  */
+	      while (*p >= '0' && *p < '9')
+		*fmt_p++ = *p++;
+
+	      gdb_assert (*p == 'p' && *(p + 1) == '\0');
+	      if (val != 0)
+		{
+#if defined (CC_HAS_LONG_LONG) && defined (PRINTF_HAS_LONG_LONG)
+		  *fmt_p++ = 'l';
+#endif
+		  *fmt_p++ = 'l';
+		  *fmt_p++ = 'x';
+		  *fmt_p++ = '\0';
+		  printf_filtered (fmt, val);
+		}
+	      else
+		{
+		  *fmt_p++ = 's';
+		  *fmt_p++ = '\0';
+		  printf_filtered (fmt, "(nil)");
+		}
+
+	      break;
+	    }
 	  default:
 	    internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__,
-			    _("failed internal consitency check"));
+			    _("failed internal consistency check"));
 	  }
 	/* Skip to the next substring.  */
 	current_substring += strlen (current_substring) + 1;
Index: testsuite/gdb.base/display.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/display.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -p -r1.11 display.exp
--- testsuite/gdb.base/display.exp	23 Aug 2007 18:14:16 -0000	1.11
+++ testsuite/gdb.base/display.exp	4 Sep 2007 13:59:45 -0000
@@ -178,6 +178,8 @@ gdb_test "printf \"\\\\!\\a\\f\\r\\t\\v\
 gdb_test "printf \"\"" ".*" "re-set term"
 gdb_test "printf \"\\w\"" ".*Unrecognized escape character.*"
 gdb_test "printf \"%d\" j" ".*Invalid argument syntax.*"
+gdb_test "printf \"%p\\n\", 0" "\\(nil\\)"
+gdb_test "printf \"%p\\n\", 1" "0x1"
 
 # play with "print", too
 #


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]