This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
> Do you think the case of a NULL type is at all common? I bet > everything that uses CHECK_TYPEDEF then looks inside the type, so if > we want null type checks, they'd be more useful before the > CHECK_TYPEDEF than inside it. Well, I don't think checking for null falls within the definition of CHECK_TYPEDEF's purpose -- other than that CHECK_TYPEDEF should not crash. How about this?
Attachment:
check_typedef.txt
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |