This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] gdb is broken: missing signal.h checking

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>, eliz at gnu dot org, denis dot pilat at st dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:13:28 -0400
Subject: Re: [RFA] gdb is broken: missing signal.h checking
References: <460BD630.20709@st.com> <19115.212.123.203.30.1175190093.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> <20070329174808.GA28084@caradoc.them.org> <uhcs37xfm.fsf@gnu.org> <20070330121226.GB7415@caradoc.them.org> <200703301853.l2UIrTSg009986@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070330190106.GA28397@caradoc.them.org> <m3k5wyh28q.fsf@codesourcery.com>

On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 02:04:37PM -0700, Jim Blandy wrote:
> 
> Does this mean we can put variable declarations after statements now?
> I love being able to declare iteration variables before loops.

That's C99, not ISO C90 :-)

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

References:
- [RFA] gdb is broken: missing signal.h checking
  - From: Denis PILAT
- Re: [RFA] gdb is broken: missing signal.h checking
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: [RFA] gdb is broken: missing signal.h checking
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [RFA] gdb is broken: missing signal.h checking
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: [RFA] gdb is broken: missing signal.h checking
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [RFA] gdb is broken: missing signal.h checking
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: [RFA] gdb is broken: missing signal.h checking
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [RFA] gdb is broken: missing signal.h checking
  - From: Jim Blandy

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]