This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFC] -thread-info new command
> > It looks like I've misremembered, as the patch I've quoted is for
> > mi_cmd_break_insert and not gdb_thread_select. However, perhaps we should
> > still resolve the issue first.
>
> Yes, I agree. Is that the latest patch posted, if you know offhand?
I had thought it was, but no. You replied with:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2006-11/msg00185.html:
It seems pretty clear to me that the patch which switched things to
return the result of catch_exceptions_with_msg was wrong. The
functions are defined to return an enum gdb_rc. Can't we make
them do that again? Simple, obviously correct.
but I could only come up with:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2006-11/msg00208.html
which didn't seem that simple and is probably not correct
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob