This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFC] varobj deletion after the binary has changed
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Nick Roberts <nickrob at snap dot net dot nz>
- Cc: Denis PILAT <denis dot pilat at st dot com>, gdb-patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 14:55:35 -0500
- Subject: Re: [RFC] varobj deletion after the binary has changed
- References: <45B8E8A8.9040904@st.com> <17849.12231.246980.478169@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070125232731.GA30178@nevyn.them.org> <45BDEAEC.1050006@st.com> <17854.28971.170898.231523@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <45C0B042.9040308@st.com> <17857.2617.164646.935952@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <45C1B78C.60605@st.com> <20070208164103.GA13544@nevyn.them.org> <17867.31476.627368.180759@kahikatea.snap.net.nz>
Thanks!
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 08:33:08AM +1300, Nick Roberts wrote:
> + @item "false"
> + The variable object does not currently hold a valid value but it
> + may hold one in the future it's associated expression comes back into scope.
"it's" -> "if its"
Other than that the content is fine with me, if the texinfo is OK with
Eli.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery