This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC/RFA/i386] pb reading insns if breakpoints still inserted


> Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 10:28:12 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> 
> Now, you could make a reasonable argument that the default when reading
> memory ought to be to ignore breakpoints.  But that would be a much
> harder change to test; we'd need to catch all the places which do need
> to see breakpoints

We don't need to catch all of them at once, if that's hard.  We can
catch them one by one and fix them as we do.

> I can only think of one off the top of my head, but I'm sure there
> are more.  So, I would suggest making it separately.

It's fine with me, but I still don't understand why it has to be in an
architecture-specific file, not in some more general place.  Am I
missing something?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]