This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC]: Document patch for F90 derived type support


> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:53:10 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Wu Zhou <woodzltc@cn.ibm.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
> Normally we try to honor the type names in debug info.

If they make sense, sure.  If they don't, I don't think we should
blindly follow them.

> If int4 is a bogus name for a type in Fortran, then this debug info
> is bogus - gfortran should be fixed.

I agree, but at least one version of gfortran that uses int4 is
already out there, so I suggest that GDB handles that as we think it's
right.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]