This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFC: Fix various problems with "printf" and warnings


On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 02:22:09AM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:
> 
> > +	    case 'o':
> > +	    case 'x':
> > +	    case 'X':
> > +	      if (seen_space || seen_plus)
> > +		bad = 1;
> 
> I don't think this should be rejected.  I've got only the C99 spec, but I
> don't think that C89 is different here in that space and plus are ignored
> for unsigned and non-numeric conversions.

That's what I figured too, but on the other hand, GCC warns about them:

drow@nevyn:~% gcc -Wformat -o a a.c
a.c: In function 'main':
a.c:7: warning: ' ' flag used with '%o' printf format

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]