This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] GDB patches for hw watchpoints - revised

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: Wu Zhou <woodzltc at cn dot ibm dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, drow at false dot org, mark at xs4all dot nl, bje at au1 dot ibm dot com, anton at au1 dot ibm dot com
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 21:44:25 +0200
Subject: Re: [RFC] GDB patches for hw watchpoints - revised
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0512221130150.16314@localhost.localdomain> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0512221153340.16314@localhost.localdomain> <uhd91eozf.fsf@gnu.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0512221241100.16314@localhost.localdomain>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:47:18 +0800 (CST)
> From: Wu Zhou <woodzltc@cn.ibm.com>
> cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, drow@false.org, mark@xs4all.nl,         bje@au1.ibm.com, anton@au1.ibm.com
> 
> 
> After we get stopped data address, we can set it back to 0, because it is 
> not used any more if not hit another time by a h/w watchpoint.  Did it 
> make sense? 

Yes, I think so.

References:
- Re: [RFC] GDB patches for hw watchpoints - revised
  - From: Wu Zhou
- Re: [RFC] GDB patches for hw watchpoints - revised
  - From: Wu Zhou
- Re: [RFC] GDB patches for hw watchpoints - revised
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: [RFC] GDB patches for hw watchpoints - revised
  - From: Wu Zhou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]