This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH: gdb/mi + doco] -var-update
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Nick Roberts <nickrob at snap dot net dot nz>, Bob Rossi <bob at brasko dot net>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 13:08:58 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH: gdb/mi + doco] -var-update
- References: <16921.18627.457594.938060@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <01c517d0$Blat.v2.4$09a26040@zahav.net.il> <16922.43915.346792.973282@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <01c51898$Blat.v2.4$f6fd05c0@zahav.net.il> <16929.8147.933720.246602@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <16955.41017.161288.832646@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20050401024942.GA2179@white> <17013.35649.62745.226730@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20050502040526.GA10023@nevyn.them.org> <17013.54662.20554.239976@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20050617034329.GH17013@nevyn.them.org>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 23:43:29 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
>
> I don't remember the entire outcome of your discussion with Eli
My opinion (which Nick eventually accepted, IIRC) is here:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2005-02/msg00204.html
> but I find the idea of having --with-values sometimes and
> --all-values other times a bit confusing. I went trying to figure
> out which meant what and that's when I noticed this problem.
If you have suggestions for better names for these options, please say
what they are. Alternatively, if you are saying that the manual patch
doesn't explain them well enough, please point out the unclear text.