This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFC] Unconditionally include shared library code
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 11:46:08PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 10:56:27 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
>
> On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 04:51:25PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Hmm, that'd work. We'll have to face the inconsistent interface issue
> > eventually, but it's a seperate issue indeed. Any objection if I
> > introduce a config/tm-solib.h and use that? Its purpose is a bit more
> > clear, and the risk of abuse is smaller. The mechanical update is not
> > without risk, but I'm willing to take it. Deal?
>
> I like it. It is indeed a tm file and shouldn't be used any other way.
>
> I reworked the patch to avoid shlib.[ch]. Looking at the changes I
> think the risk of changing solib.h into tm-solib.h under config/ is
> riskier than leaving config/ alone and simply removing the #defines
> from solib.h. I'm moving towards checking in the attached patch at
> the end of the coming week.
I like this even more! Kevin?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC