This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: D Symbol Demangling


On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 04:45:05PM -0400, John Demme wrote:
> By link compatible, I mean that I'll compile a D file with a D compiler
> to a .o file, then I can link it with another .o file compiled with,
> say, gcc.  So a source file can be either C or D, but not both (barring
> some sort of bizarre scripting situations.)  An important note here,
> however, is that because D can call C functions, some of the symbols in
> a D object file won't be mangled.
> 
> I've been having trouble figuring out what differentiates the functions.
> On the surface, the more complex ones don't work, but in my test,
> there's only simple one.
> 
> Do I appear to be interfacing with GDB correctly?  If so, I'll triple
> check my code.

Nothing is obviously wrong.  I'd need to look at a sample file to say
anything else.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]