This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[RFC]sim/common/sim-types.h multiple defines defines?


I notice in src/sim/common/sim-types.h there are multiple defines of
unsigned32 and unsigned64. I think it was intended to be signed32 and
signed64. Or am I wrong? Also, why does not gcc generate an error
message/warning for this?

The XLC compiler on AIX reports this as an error. Here is a patch that
shows what I think should be the right definitions...


--- ./sim-types.h       2005-03-29 17:18:40.000000000 -0600
+++ ./new/sim-types.h   2005-03-29 17:19:13.000000000 -0600
@@ -112,11 +112,11 @@ typedef struct { signed64 a[2]; } signed
 typedef signed char signed8;
 typedef signed short signed16;
 #if defined (__ALPHA__)
-typedef signed int unsigned32;
-typedef signed long unsigned64;
+typedef signed int signed32;
+typedef signed long signed64;
 #else
-typedef signed long unsigned32;
-typedef signed long long unsigned64;
+typedef signed long signed32;
+typedef signed long long signed64;
 #endif

 typedef unsigned char unsigned8;


-----
manjo
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ Cogito ergo sum                                                          +
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]