This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] Improve "start" command for Ada
- From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- To: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 13:12:14 -0800
- Subject: Re: [RFA] Improve "start" command for Ada
- References: <20041021034759.GP21300@gnat.com> <01c4b72e$Blat.v2.2.2$b14feb80@zahav.net.il> <20041021210951.GZ21300@gnat.com> <20041101194703.GH27334@gnat.com> <16810.33941.938548.637890@localhost.redhat.com> <20041201030309.GE1204@adacore.com> <20050209170543.GE18540@adacore.com> <20050307192951.GP1750@adacore.com> <16940.49472.585572.202096@localhost.redhat.com>
Elena,
Thank you very much.
> It would be useful if you pointed to the last version of the patch to
> look at. Is this the last one?
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-10/msg00365.html
That's correct. Sorry about not pointing at the latest patch, I should
have done that. Next time, don't hesitate to ask me to do the search
for you, I'll be more than happy to do so.
> If so, can you please add a comment about what could be done instead
> of calling ada_main_name directly?
> Something like what you wrote:
Sure, will add the comment and commit.
> > > If you want, what we can do is replace the hard-coded call to
> > > ada_main_name() by a loop of calls to a new language method,
> > > looping on all languages until we find a positive match. That
> > > way, the hard wiring to Ada disappears.
>
> Otherwise ok
Thanks a lot!
--
Joel