This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] New GDB target iq2000


On Mar  5 15:20, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:17:45PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Yup.  Although the lower-limit for first-line breakpoints may cause
> > bogus parameter values to be printed.  I consider that less a problem
> > than my program unexpectedly running to completion though.  The
> > problem is that some people tend to think differently and we never
> > reached consensus about it.
> 
> Well, it makes sense to me.  It's clear that the FRV and submitted
> iq2000 ports have different heuristics for these two cases; it would be
> good to cover both of them in common code.

This is rather getting a generic discussion to me.  What about the
iq2000 port itself?  Does it make sense to defer iq2000 until after
the generic problem has been solved?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Project Co-Leader
Red Hat, Inc.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]