Re: Assume solib.h

["Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at gnu dot org>]

> Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:13:54 -0500
> From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
> Cc: mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, joseph@codesourcery.com, kevinb@redhat.com,
>         gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
> 
> >>and how my change breaks it?
> > 
> > 
> > This part I don't know the details about.  Mark said that it does
> > break, and I spoke on the assumption that you agree with the fact of
> > breakage,
> 
> Unfortunatly your assumption is wrong.

I wrote that before this was established.

> As I stated to Mark, and 
> contrary to his assertion, powerpc-elf passes this sniff test:

The discussion would have stayed more technical and calm if, instead
of elevating it to a principle to which some of us disagree, you'd
show the facts and tried to convince.

>  >  but don't consider it important.
> 
> The mind boggles, if the facts aren't important, what is?

I think you simply misunderstood what I wrote.