This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA]: Watchpoints per thread patch


> Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 15:48:32 -0500
> From: Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com>
> Cc: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
>         gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
> > We could use a Linux native specific observer, or handle this through
> > the target stack.  I think handling it through the target stack makes
> > more sense, but I haven't sketched out what the target method would
> > look like.  If other GDB developers think that the precedent of a
> > native-code-only observer isn't a bad one, then maybe we should go back
> > to your previous placement of the observer and give it a Linux specific
> > name.  This will be aided by renaming thread-db to be clearly Linux
> > native code.
> >
> 
> Ok.  I'll wait and see if anybody else has objections.  Eli, I understand that I 
> would have to rename the observer and change its definition appropriately.

Yes, if you decide to modify the observer's name to a
GNU/Linux-specific one.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]