This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Michael, Attached is a patch with changes, I tested this patch on X86 (debian sarge) and PowerPC 64bit (SLES 9). Attached is a sample gdb.log from my PowerPC testing. this is ok to apply? Thanks a ton ----- Manjo +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + Cognito ergo sum + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Michael Chastain wrote: > Hi Manoj, > > Three things: > > . Use "lsearch" rather than "lindex". The spec for gdb_file_cmd says > that it can return several words after the MESSAGE. So something > like: > > if { [lsearch -exact [lrange $result 1 end] "nodebug"] >= 0 } > > That way, the caller will keep working after gdb_file_cmd adds more words. > > . Include a ChangeLog entry with the patch. > > . Say what system you tested the patch on, and how you tested it. > > Michael >
Attachment:
gdb.gdb.patch.v2
Description: PATCH for gdb.gdb testcases
Attachment:
gdb.log
Description: gdb.log (sample)
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |