Re: [RFA]: Fix for pending breakpoints in manually loaded/unloadedshlibs

[Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>]

> > Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:57:54 -0400
> > > From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
> > >
> > > Right.  In addition to the breakpoints, the MI needs to know about these 
> > > identical events (so that it can notify the gui of an shlib unload).
>
>
> Not that I'm against this, but perhaps instead of implementing a core
> GDB feature based on the observers (which, as far as I understand,
> were invented for a different purpose), we should talk about two
> separate changes: one that adds the observer, and another that fixes
> the problem reported by Jeff.

Um, observers were introduced for this purpose - make it possible for 
anything, core or peripheral, to monitor changes in the inferior/GDB. 
Otherwize we end up with things like this.

	observer_notify_solib_unloaded (...);
	breakpoint_notify_solib_unloaded (...);

I'm currently investigating gdb.threads/static.exp failures and to fix 
that I think I'll need to add a further observer event.

Andrew