This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [testsuite] Kfail signals.exp failures

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis at chello dot nl>
Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, mec dot gnu at mindspring dot com
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 09:11:05 -0400
Subject: Re: [testsuite] Kfail signals.exp failures
References: <20040808231810.GA24826@nevyn.them.org> <200408090745.i797jnFc000594@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>

On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 09:45:49AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>    Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 19:18:10 -0400
>    From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> 
>    2004-08-08  Daniel Jacobowitz  <dan@debian.org>
> 
> 	   PR gdb/1738
> 	   * gdb.base/signals.exp (signal_tests_1): KFAIL bug in continuing
> 	   from a breakpoint with a pending signal.
> 
> Hmm, SPARC doesn't have hardware single-step.  Solaris SPARC has
> single-stepping implemented in the kernel, but all other OS'es don't
> have that.

I wonder if this test passes anywhere?  Thinking about it again, the
software singlestep breakpoint is inserted when !breakpoints_inserted,
so the same problem should apply.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [testsuite] Kfail signals.exp failures
  - From: Andrew Cagney

References:
- [testsuite] Kfail signals.exp failures
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [testsuite] Kfail signals.exp failures
  - From: Mark Kettenis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]