This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] MIPS_TEXT symbols should be associated to .text section?


   From: Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>
   Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:19:04 +0200

   Joel Brobecker wrote:
   > Hello BFD maintainers,
   > 
   > Ping? This patch is only 8 days old, and I wouldn't send a reminder
   > just a week after sending it, but GDB is completely broken without
   > this patch (ie "break main; run" doesn't work)... Would somebody mind
   > having a look at it and tell me if it is good or not?

Joel, I'm seeing similar problems on NetBSD/mips (NetBSD/pmax 1.6.2 to
be precise).

   [snip]

   > >  #if 0 /* for SGI_COMPAT */
   > >      case SHN_MIPS_TEXT:
   > >        asym->section = mips_elf_text_section_ptr;

   The last three lines in this patch suggest AFAICS to use
   mips_elf_text_section_ptr instead of bfd_get_section_by_name,
   and to make the test conditional on SGI_COMPAT. The SHN_MIPS_DATA
   below should probably get handled similiarily.

Well, mips_elf_text_section_ptr doesn't really exist.

Mark


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]